Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of CSR at PT Perkebunan Nusantara X (PTPN X) based on the CSR Hierarchical Pyramid perspective. This research is a qualitative library research with a case study approach. The data in this study are secondary data in the form of annual reports and sustainability reports of PTPN X for the 2020-2022 period collected through documentation. The results of this study indicate that (1) The results of the study indicate that almost all of PTPN X's CSR practices are in accordance with the CSR Hierarchical Pyramid which includes legal, economic, social philanthropy, environmental, and spiritual responsibilities. (2) PTPN X has fulfilled economic, environmental, and spiritual responsibilities (3) In legal responsibility, PTPN X has not disclosed the company's efforts to integrate with the customary laws of the community (4) In fulfilling social philanthropy responsibilities, gender equality indicators cannot be implemented optimally due to the inequality of employee gender ratios. Indicators of improving education and health quality have not been implemented consistently. (5) PTPN X has carried out spiritual responsibilities, this is reflected in policies and various activities based on policy values as God commands. (5) The results also prove that the concept of CSR Hierarchical Pyramid can be used as a model for implementing corporate CSR.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fu’adah, S., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2024). Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility at PT. Plantation X Based on the Perspective of "CSR Hierarchical Pyramid”. Basic and Applied Accounting Research Journal, 4(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.11594/baarj.04.02.03

References

Carroll, A. B., 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, Volume 34, p. 42.
Deegan, C. M., 2014. Financial Accounting Theory. Australia: McGraw-Hill Education.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. In: California: Sage.
Moir, L., 2001. What do We Mean by Corporate Social Responsibility?. Corporate Governance, 1, pp. 16-22.
Muhid, H. K., 2022. Regulasi Pelaksanaan CSR bagi Perusahaan, Apa Sanksi Jika Tak Melaksanakan?. [Online]
Available at: https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1594555/regulasi-pelaksanaan-csr-bagi-perusahaan-apa-sanksi-jika-tak-melaksanakan
Nazir, M., 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nur, M. & Priantinah, D., 2012. Analisis Faktor-Fakor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. Jurnal Nominal Vol.1 No.1, p. 24.
PTPNX, 2019. Code of Conduct, Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2020. Annual Report, Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2020. Sustainability Report , Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2021. Annual Report, Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2021. Sustainability Report, Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2022. Annual Report, Surabaya: PTPN X.
PTPNX, 2022. Sustainability Report, Surabaya: PTPN X.
Puspitarini, A. Z. & Sukoharsono, E. G., 2018. Studi Komparatif Pengungkapan Kinerja Keberlanjutan Perusahaan Industri Pupuk di Indonesia Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Index (Analisis Pada Laporan Keberlanjutan PT Pupuk Kalimantan Timur, PT Pupuk Sriwidjaja Palembang, dan PT Petrokimia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, p. 3.
Riswari, D. A. & Cahyonowati, N., 2012. Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi pada Perusahan Publik Non-Finansial yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2009). Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume 1, p. 3.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R., 2016. Research Methods for Business. Italy: Printer Trento Srl..
Sukoharsono, E. G., Widhianingrum, P. & Purba, A. S., 2021. Constructing A Hierarchical Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Model from Legal and Economic to Spiritual Obligation. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, p. 169.